Cognitive Rights Observatory Independent organization
ES EN

Current affairs

What the builders are saying

Public statements, corporate documents, court testimony and internal records from the companies that design digital environments and artificial intelligence systems.

Each entry reproduces the exact words of its author, states where and when they were said, and links to the source. A new edition every Monday.

Nature of the documents

  • Public statement. Said in public by the person to whom it is attributed.
  • Corporate document. Published by the company itself through an official channel.
  • Disclosed internal document. A document not meant for publication, brought to light in legal proceedings.
  • Court filing or testimony. A court filing or a statement given before a court.
  • Insider account. An account by someone who worked inside the organisation.
Field
Document

Edition IV · 19 October 2026

On 14 October eight state attorneys general filed coordinated lawsuits against OpenAI reproducing internal company material, among it an email from its Head of Alignment to the board stating that safety came third, behind product and revenue. Five days earlier, three dismissed safety researchers published an open letter arguing that the manner of their dismissal chills internal safety work. On 7 October the Florida Attorney General sought a temporary injunction against Meta resting on the company’s internal material about social comparison, and the same day OpenAI published usage figures for teenagers on ChatGPT. Elsewhere in the period, Character.AI opened a sale process with closure as the alternative, Meta launched a declarative control over the Facebook algorithm and Precision Neuroscience reported an atlas of the nervous system built from recordings of seventy patients.

Edition III · 5 October 2026

On 28 September the Florida Attorney General asked a court to enjoin OpenAI from giving ChatGPT human attributes and from offering the service to minors in the state. The next day the company introduced “dots”, always-on agents it describes as giving the user back time and attention, and published the GPT-6.1 Sol system card, where under-eighteens appear as a six-category table with no accompanying prose. On 3 October David Robinson, who led OpenAI’s safety reports, resigned with an essay published in The Atlantic, and the following day Sam Altman defended accepting certain harms in exchange for people having agency. Elsewhere, Christopher Olah stated Anthropic’s uncertainty about whether its models are conscious, Meta expanded its Instagram school programme and TikTok presented to the United Nations a control over AI-generated content in the feed.

Edition II · 28 September 2026

On 23 September the chief executives of OpenAI and Anthropic addressed the United Nations Security Council; the same day OpenAI extended its advertising product to new markets and Meta unveiled at its annual conference a conversational agent it describes as a personal superintelligence. On 25 September TikTok signed with the Alabama attorney general the first state settlement in the wave of litigation over harm to minors, accepting design obligations that include a default non-personalised feed for teenage accounts. The same day a New Mexico jury found Facebook liable for more than forty-three million violations of the state’s trade practices law, and Meta answered by invoking the First Amendment. In neurotechnology, Precision Neuroscience reported more than one hundred patient procedures with a cortical interface of 4,096 electrodes.

Edition I · 14 September 2026

This first instalment sets the baseline: the statements, corporate documents and court records of the past year that define the industry’s public position. On 12 September the chief executive of Anthropic called for slowing the pace at which models improve, three days after a researcher at his own company resigned accusing the sector of the opposite. In parallel, the federal trial in Oakland brought to light internal Meta documents on how its products for minors were designed.

No entry matches those filters.

A note on method

Only words verified against the linked source are carried here: the original document where it is reachable and, where it is not, the outlet that reproduces it, stated in each entry. Quotes are published in their original language. Internal records obtained through litigation are identified as such and do not amount to a public position of the company. To report an error or a wrong attribution, write to the Observatory.